Yaicha

Ted’s take on the world, one topic at a time.

Law of Unintended Consequences

Posted by Ted Hopton on January 20, 2008

The Law of Unintended Consequences is a concept that has fascinated me since I learned about it as a child. The irony of good intentions producing disastrous results opened my eyes and showed me that “it’s the thought that counts” was a rather foolish claim to make.

This NYT article, “Unintended Consequences,” by Freakonomics authors Steven Levitt and Stephan Dubner, uses three widely different examples to illustrate this concept in a refreshing way.

But before charging ahead with such plans, the new president might do well to first ask him- or herself the following question: What do a deaf woman in Los Angeles, a first-century Jewish sandal maker and a red-cockaded woodpecker have in common?

Each turns out to be an example, of course, of unintended consequences. Here’s the conclusion:

So does this mean that every law designed to help endangered animals, poor people and the disabled is bound to fail? Of course not. But with a government that is regularly begged for relief — these days, from mortgage woes, health-care costs and tax burdens — and with every presidential hopeful making daily promises to address these woes, it might be worth encouraging the winning candidate to think twice (or even 8 or 10 times) before rushing off to do good. Because if there is any law more powerful than the ones constructed in a place like Washington, it is the law of unintended consequences.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.